Universities, LNP Style.

Mr Turnbull is seldom economic with words but when it comes to education he has reduced the old style Abbottesque three-word slogan to a two-word slogan. The old ‘Stop the boats’ has become ‘Innovation Nation.’ This may sound like a step forward but it is the same old LNP following the same old policy of repeating simple slogans often. If the ‘fine print’ words of Malcolm Turnbull are listened to it is the same old LNP policy of screwing the general population for the sole purpose of giving to big business.

Malcolm Turnbull wants Universities to produce graduates that conform only to the demands of big business. He talks of producing graduates that are ‘relevant’ to ‘today’s world.’ If the sole criteria for a balanced healthy society were the performance of a particular narrowly defined task in exchange for money Turnbull would make sense. But is this all there is to life? Does a well-rounded education built around the ability to think and create mean nothing?

Good universities have been places where students are encouraged to push the limits with the understanding that as much can be learned for failure as from success even if it appears to lead nowhere. It does lead somewhere of course. It leads to a population that can think and create, that can accept that failure is not failure but a step towards future progress. It would be impossible to list all the failures of university research that have lead to accidental discoveries that have changed the world. It is not generally understood that the world we know today with all of its technological progress has come about largely from recognizing the accidental success inherent in failure.

Big business is not about exploring. It is about finding new ways of becoming more efficient at doing the same old thing based solely on the accountant’s bottom line. This is a recipe for stagnation. Over the years Australia has become extremely efficient at digging holes in the ground. Economically his has been a delight to accountants but now that there is an over supply of holes in the ground there is a problem. Turnbull’s Innovation Nation is not about filling in the holes of the past but digging new holes for Australia to fall into. The problem is that when big business is allowed to focus all of a country’s educational resources in one direction the rich diversity that guarantees the future health of the nation is lost. Malcolm Turnbull must not be allowed to focus all of their educational resources to fulfilling the dictates of big business. There may appear to be short-term benefits to the bottom line but would only be another disaster delayed for a few years.

Malcolm Turnbull talks of a nimble economy able to respond to change. The reality is that Turnbull style education policy destroys the ability to respond to change. They are focused only on the short-term interests of bug business that has never understood that tomorrow things will change.

Much of what universities teach and research may appear to be useless to the general public but nobody knows what is going to happen tomorrow. Somewhere in our universities there are students and researchers working on totally useless projects that are going to lead to the happy accident that will cure cancer, MS and a multitude of other medical aberrations. Somewhere a happy accident is waiting to happen that will lead to a clean sustainable world with unlimited clean energy. What are our universities discovering with their useless research? We don’t know because it has happened yet. But when it does happen it will surprise everyone, even the researchers.

Big business is not interested in happy accidents because they are not conducive to higher share prices and returns to shareholders. Finding a cure for cancer and MS will be majorly detrimental to pharmaceutical companies bottom line. What will Clive Palmer, BP and Santos do when somewhere a university announces it has made an accidentally discovered how to produce unlimited clean power from a common renewable non-polluting source? The University won’t say it was an accident of course. They will say they have been working on it behind closed doors for years. These accidents won’t happen unless universities are allowed to carry out research and play just because they can.

Business relies on scarcity. They must have more of what others don’t have. This is crunch for our universities when they must decide if they are going to be educational providers that advance knowledge for all or are they gong to be instruments by which big business increases scarcity in the name of ever increasing profit.

Which way our universities go will depend on if the public allows Malcolm Turnbull to destroy our university system and replace it with a system of training human robots to be exploited by big business for profit, and to the detriment of society in general.

Is Abbott now going to target disaster Victims?

How sick is it to target bush fire, flood and other victims of natural disasters via the productivity commission? The productivity commission has become Abbott’s hit squad.

There are many things where the commercial concept of productivity does not apply. If compassion and empathy count for nothing no disaster aid is productive.

Just when I think it is impossible for Abbott to go any lower he finds away. We have stuck refugees away out of site in concentration camps in foreign lands. We have ‘liberated’ Holden workers from the yoke of the nasty General Motors multinational. We have condemned to Australians to being uneducated Hill Billys living an internet backwater. And now Abbott not only wants to repeal the little we are doing to combat the environmental disaster called climate change but also wants to deny humanitarian help to potential victims.

This man is sick.

Is Abbott on a Mission from God?

This is a comment on my blog Abbott and Santamaria that needed more prominence than the comments section.

Yosef, I’m afraid that yes, we do forget the lessons of history very quickly. And yes, you have every reason to be afraid of his economics and his politics. I strongly suspect that Tony is on ‘a mission from God.’ Why else would he use the expression ‘act of contrition’ after meeting with Malaysian leaders, or ‘the government is on the side of the angels’ after refusing to stop GMH  from leaving the country? I think that Tony honestly believes that God is a neo-liberal and that he’s been put on earth to carry out God’s work.

This is not the first time such lunatics have caused social dislocation on a massive scale. In China, during the 1850s, a gentleman who claimed to be the brother of Jesus started the T’ai Ping Rebellion and literally millions died as a result. ‘Sam Collinson’ (Hung Hsiu-ch’aun) believed that he was creating  ‘Dai-ping, Dai-guo’, a Kingdom of Heavenly Peace. Hung was barking mad of course but then again insanity has never been an impediment to entering politics (Hitler, Stalin, Mao). I wouldn’t be in the least surprised if Abbott feels that he’s creating his own ‘kingdom of heavenly peace.’ With a little help from George Pell (spiritual adviser) and Rupert Murdoch ( Ministry of Information).

Author : edward eastwood (IP: 58.6.227.69 , 58-6-227-69.dyn.iinet.net.au)

E-mail : eastwoodedward09@gmail.com

URL    : http://www.mugwumpost.wordpress.com

Whois  : http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/58.6.227.69

How much did Abbott Government Contribute to Holden Decision?

The report that the decision to close Holden came by way of a phone call half hour before the decision was announced sounds strange. It sounds as if the Abbott Government was bypassed in the announcement. If you look at the way the Abbott government has been trying to bully General Motors in the last week it is not so strange. If the decision was marginal it was time for negotiation, not for throwing governmental weight around in the media. Did Abbott tell GM of any of his announcements before he made them public? How would a company like GM react to a person like Hockey threatening them in Parliament instead of talking to them? Did GM simply join the long list of entities, such as Indonesia, China and the UN that the Abbott government has managed to piss off in the last three months? Did the ‘Perfect Storm’ GM refereed to include Abbott?

All over the world countries subsidies and support local car industries because they understand that a country that builds cars can build anything. Car making is the basic training ground and skills development area that all other manufacturing industries rely on. If Australia stops making cars the backbone of Australian manufacturing will be gone. If Abbott continues treating major manufacturing companies the way he treated GM the mining companies will be the only ones left and they only dig holes.

Abbott’s backward facing stance sees digging more holes and dumping the waste on the Greet Barrier reef as the way forward. Or maybe Australia becoming no more than a quarry is what this is all about. It might be good for the big mining companies in the short term but the world is changing rapidly and we need to be able to look after ourselves. That means the ability to be as self sufficient as possible. Take away the car industry and we become dependent on others in a way that takes Australia back 60 years.

Fortunately there is just sufficient time for one more election before Holden closes and I hope that Labour will start negotiating a deal with GM to keep manufacturing in Australia to be implemented when Labour wins the next election.

Mr Abbott, Car manufacturing is a core industry.

Today Julia Gillard spoke to senior members of the car industry today. I am glad that, unlike Tone Abbott, Ms Gillard understands how vital it is to have a viable car industry in Australia.

The skills in car making are core skills that can be directed to any manufacturing. If country has a car industry it can manufacture anything.Why are the wind turbines appearing all over Australia and New Zealand being built in Germany? If we need to subsidise windmill making we get it back in jobs and taxes. It also does wonders Balance of Payment figures.

We could easily produce aircraft for Australian Conditions. We already have a small aircraft industry that exporting all over the world.

The Big 6 Aussie car is dead. So is the V8. But that is not all there is to making cars in Australia.Ford and Holden are tied to the concepts of America. It could be that Ford and Holden just do not understand Australia. Most of us don’t live in the outback miles from anywhere. We live in cities and the transport we need is to satisfy Australian needs.

Western Australia needs more rail carriages. Why should they built overseas? Surely a contribution to WA by the Federal Government  to have the rail cars built in Australia would be good for everyone? We could licenses build European designs and even if they cost more it is still cost effective.We need more busses.

We need light cars were public transport is not viable yet. Has anyone asked if there is anyone who wants to use the ford factories to produce unique cars that Australian’s want.How about Crowd Sourcing? It has worked well on the world wide web. Why doesn’t the Government ask for expressions of interest and then throw it open it to the public to raise the start-up money.

The www is littered with successful projects that big companies have rejected. Ford walks away? So what? Do we really need them?This is a democracy. Why can’t we say ‘Has anyone any ideas of how to use the Ford factories?’ If we rely on the Australian Parliament for good ideas we are working with a very limited gene pool.

A democracy working properly will call on all resources to slove problems and work fo the common good.The old Air Defense has gone. The F35 an antique already. It is a pregnant duck that is no match for Russian Sukhoi aircraft or the Chinese copies already in service.The future for air defense is ‘swarm’ technology.

Thousands of little unmanned aircraft that communicated and act like a swarm of mosquitoes. The perfect starting point for this technology is the Australian designed and built Jindivik. We also have the software expertise.If the Government started now the Ford factories could easily be switched over to building swarm aircraft. Swarm technology would set us free from being blackmailed by the American aircraft industry. Why do we need to continue to ship all that money overseas when it could be spent here to better effect?

The defense budget may not go down, it never does. But the money would be spent in Australia, and we would a much better air defense than a front line consisting of a few pregnant ducks.

The problem with the accounts view of the world is that we look at the bottom line. The bottom line says car making in Australia is dead. But that is only half the story.

What happens when we add in the money saved from not having workers on Newstart? What happens when the taxes paid by workers cease to exist? What is the social cost throwing families that come with unemployment. What happens when we spend money in Australia instead of overseas?

But above all what happens to our technical/manufacturing capacity if we do not maintain a car making capacity. With a car industry we can build anything, but if the car industry disappears we can build nothing.

Whilst making his speech to the recent IPA dinner Murdoch warned against, not only about giving welfare to single mothers but also giving any industry support to manufacturing. If you want know Abbott’s policy on anything ask Murdoch. The Abbott policy on supporting manufacturing is he will not to do it.